CCP Tightens Control of Low Income Population as More Chinese Fall Into Poverty

1 week ago 28

The Chinese communist regime’s Ministry of Civil Affairs issued a notice in recent days requiring all local governments to strengthen monitoring of low-income populations.

China’s state TV network CCTV reported on May 6 that the Ministry of Civil Affairs required all localities to strengthen the identification and dynamic monitoring of low-income populations.

Those to be identified include minimum living security recipients, extremely poor people, families on the margins of minimum living security, and families with basic expenditure difficulties, etc, according to the notice. It also required strengthening dynamic monitoring of low-income populations, and that all localities should aim at “preventing risks.” The notice does not mention low-income criteria.

In January 2022, the Ministry of Civil Affairs stated that as of the end of 2021, a low-income population database containing more than 58 million people had been formed across the country. By October 2023, the Ministry of Civil Affairs said that the national low-income population dynamic monitoring information platform had collected basic information on more than 66 million low-income people, accounting for approximately 4.7 percent of the country’s total population.

China observers pointed out that the Chinese regime’s low-income population is much larger than the official number and its low-income population monitoring system is for regime stability as more middle class have fallen into poverty.

U.S.-based China observer Wang He questioned the data. “According to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) own official figures, the number of low-income people in 2021 was 58 million. After the COVID-19 pandemic, the number increased by 8 million to 66 million. The question is that China’s low-income population is really only 66 million?” he told The Epoch Times.

Related Stories

1 in 5 Canadian Households Facing ‘Energy Poverty’
 Report

Lai Rongwei, CEO of the Taiwan Inspirational Association, told The Epoch Times, “when the CCP conducts such low-income population monitoring, they falsify the data, but the number is increasing, which has confirmed that China’s economy is in serious decline, and the middle-class families’ current incomes are also declining.”

Mass Poverty

According to the World Bank, the poverty line is daily living expenses per person at $5.50 or below, about 1,200 yuan per month. In May 2020, China’s then-Premier Li Keqiang said that China had “600 million people whose monthly income is only about 1,000 yuan,” which attracted attention to the mass poverty of the world’s second-largest economy.

Mr. Wang said that Li accidentally revealed that 600 million people have low incomes, and the official now only says 66 million people. “This shows that China has a large number of low-income people, and the CCP has tried every means to cover up the true situation.”

In recent years, China’s subsistence allowance fraud and corruption by local authorities have been exposed from time to time.

Mr. Wang said that the CCP’s subsistence allowance system was originally meant to keep those in poverty alive, but the CCP’s corruption is everywhere. “The right to identify subsistence allowances belongs to the CCP’s township level, and they get state financial subsidies into their own pockets.”

Mr. Lai said that the CCP’s corruption is throughout its system from the central to local levels. “Many low-income households cannot get the subsistence money.”

Mr. Wang said that people will rebel when they cannot survive, so the CCP strictly controls the entire society and adopts many methods, including establishing a subsistence allowance system and now strengthening its monitoring of the poor.

Mr. Lai said that migrant workers from rural areas who cannot find jobs in cities and have insufficient food may be dissatisfied and even connected with each other to form networks. The CCP has now launched various means to maintain stability, including issuing subsistence allowances. “It is said to be a living subsidy to low-income people, but it is actually a very strong concept of maintaining stability.”

Ning Haizhong and Luo Ya contributed to this report.

Read Entire Article